Перейти к публикации

ГЕНОЦИД АРМЯН мировое признание


TMQ

Рекомендованные сообщения

/30.11.2004/

Словакия признала Геноцид армян в Османской Турции 1915 года

Национальное Собрание Словакии 30-го ноября 70 голосами "за" признало историческим фактом Геноцид армян в Турции в 1915 г.

Как сообщил в эфире Общественного телевидения Армении руководитель местной армянской диаспоры Словакии Ашот Григорян, парламент принял решение в пользу исторической справедливости несмотря на настоятельные призывы правительства Словакии проявить осторожность в данном вопросе.

Глава армянской общины также проинформировал, что председатель парламента Словакии Павел Рушовски, готовит речь против членства Турции в ЕС. Также предполагается, что словакский парламент обратится ко всем законодательным органам Европы с предложением потребовать от Турции в виде предусловия принять осуждающий Геноцид резолюцию.

http://www.regnum.ru/news/368517.html

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Canada, House of Commons, Resolution

April 23, 1996

House of Commons Resolution — Canada

April 23, 1996

That this House recognize, on the occasion of the 81st anniversary of the Armenian tragedy which claimed some 1.5 million lives that took place on April 24, 1915, and in recognition of other crimes against humanity, the week of April 20 to 27 of each year as the week of remembrance of the inhumanity of people toward one another.

The question was put on the main motion, as amended, and it was agreed to.

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Greece (Hellenic Republic), Parliament, Resolution

April 25, 1996

Hellenic Parliament Resolution 2397/1996

25 April 1996

The bill "For the establishment of the 24th of April as the day of commemoration of the genocide of Armenians by Turkey" was unanimously accepted in principle, in article and in its entirety in one discussion and is as follows:

The 24th of April is established as the day of commemoration of the genocide of Armenians by Turkey.

Article 1

The 24th of April is defined as the day of commemoration of the genocide of Armenians by Turkey.

Article 2

The character, content, bearer and manner of organization of the commemoration events are determined by a presidential decree that is issued with the proposal of the Ministries of the Interior, and of Public Administration and Decentralization, after taking into consideration the advice of the most recognized Armenian guilds and organizations.

Article 3

The present law will be in effect after its publication in the Official Gazette of the Hellenic Government.

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

U.S., House of Representatives, Resolution 3540

June 11, 1996

104th Congress

2nd Session

House Resolution 3540

An Act

Making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

...

LIMITATION OF ASSISTANCE TO TURKEY

SEC. 547. Not more than $22,000,000 of the funds appropriated in this Act under the heading "Economic Support Fund" may be made available to the Government of Turkey, except when it is made known to the Federal official having authority to obligate or expend such funds that the Government of Turkey has (1) joined the United States in acknowledging the atrocity committed against the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to 1923; and (2) taken all appropriate steps to honor the memory of the victims of the Armenian genocide.

...

That the following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and for other purposes, namely:

...

Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 1996.

Attest: Clerk.

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Lebanon, Chamber of Deputies, Resolution

April 3, 1997

Republic of Lebanon

Chamber of Deputies

The Lebanese Chamber of Deputies

Feeling the pains and suffering that the Lebanese-Armenian people lived through between 1915 and 1923, similar to the suffering of the Lebanese people and the peoples of the region, which continues until today, resulting from the organized extermination acts against our peoples at the hands of the colonizer in the beginning of the century.

Whereas the 24th day of April of each year constitutes an occasion to mark this catastrophe embodied by the massacres committed against the Armenian people.

The Chamber of Deputies calls upon the people of Lebanon to declare their solidarity with the Armenian people on this day.

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Belgium, Senate, Resolution

March 26, 1998

"...that the recognition of mistakes and crimes of the past is a precondition for reconciliation between peoples and that there cannot be peace without justice..."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26 March 1998

Belgian Senate

1997-1998 Session

Resolution 1-736/3 Concerning the 1915 Genocide of Armenians living in Turkey

The Senate,

Considering the numerous studies dedicated to the situation of the Armenian population in Turkey at the beginning of the 20th century;

Considering the UN convention on the prevention and punishment of genocide, which provides a definition of the concept of genocide;

Considering the judicial verdicts that have applied this term to describe the state of Armenians living in Turkey in 1915, more specifically the verdict of the 'tribunal de grande instance' in Paris on 21 June 1995;

Considering the resolution by the European Parliament on 18 June 1987 concerning a "political solution to the Armenian Question", wherein it is recognized that the Armenians living in Turkey in 1915 were the victims of a genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman government of the time;

Considering that there cannot be the slightest doubt over the historical evidence regarding the organized and systematic murder of the Armenians;

Considering that the recognition of mistakes and crimes of the past is a precondition for reconciliation between peoples and that there cannot be peace without justice, either in Armenia or elsewhere;

Furthermore considering that only through the recognition of crimes committed by previous regimes it is possible to distance oneself from their aims and strive politically for reconciliation;

Considering that the differences between the Turkish and Armenian nations continue to drag on and even today lead to the loss of human lives, to the eviction of ethnic groups and to numerous violations of human rights in that region;

Considering that the Turkish and Armenian peoples have no choice but to co-exist peacefully in the long term;

Considering the friendly ties and co-operation between, on the one hand, Turkey, Belgium and the European Union and, on the other hand, Armenia, Belgium and the European Union;

Remarking that the 1987 resolution by the European Parliament has not led the Turkish government to recognize the historic reality of the 1915 genocide;

Requests the Turkish government to recognize the historic reality of the genocide committed in 1915 by the last government of the Ottoman Empire;

Requests the parliaments of the member states of the European Union to contribute to the reconciliation between the Turkish and Armenian peoples;

Requests the European Union and its member states to lend their support to initiatives in all domains aimed at promoting a dialogue between the Armenian and Turkish peoples;

Asks the government to transmit this resolution to the prime minister of the Turkish government, to the chairman of the European parliament, to the chairman of the European Commission, to the chairmen of the parliaments of the member states of the European Union, as well as to the chairman of the parliament of the Republic of Armenia.

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution

April 24, 1998

Commemoration of the Armenian genocide of 1915

Written Declaration No. 275

Doc. 8091

24 April 1998

This written declaration commits only the members who have signed it

1. The date of 24 April 1915 marked the beginning of the implementation of the plan to exterminate Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire.

2. Today we commemorate the anniversary of what has been called the first genocide of the 20th century, and we salute the memory of the Armenian victims of this crime against humanity.

Signed:

Roudy, France, SOC

Jeambrun, France, LDR

Matt?i, France, LDR

Michel, France, SOC

Schreiner, France, EDG

Vrettos, Greece, SOC

Zissi, Greece, SOC

Katseli, Greece, SOC

Maginas, Greece, EPP/CD

Loule, Greece, UEL

Steolea, Romania, EDG

Lukin, Russia, LDR

Marmazov, Ukraine, UEL

Oleynik, Ukraine, UEL

Zhebrovsky, Russia, NR

Schieder, Austria, SOC

Christodoulides, Cyprus, UEL

Frahm, Denmark, UEL

Kulbaka, Russia, UEL

Myrvoll, Norway, UEL

Lazarescu, Romania, LDR

Verspaget, Netherlands, SOC

Mignon, France, EDG

Lengagne, France, SOC

Dees, Netherlands, LDR

Woltjer, Netherlands, SOC

Slobodnik, Slovakia, SOC

Gonzalez Laxe, Spain, SOC

Gross, Switzerland, SOC

Lord Russell-Johnston, United Kingdom, LDR

Lauricella, Italy, SOC

Turini, Italy, EDG

Amoruso, Italy, EDG

Elo, Finland, SOC

Pereira Marques, Portugal, SOC

Staes, Belgium, EPP/CD

Maximus, Belgium, SOC

Mota Amaral, Portugal, EPP/CD

Vyvadil, Czech Republic, SOC

Plechata, Czech Republic, EDG

Stepova, Czech Republic, SOC

Janecek, Czech Republic, EPP/CD

Novakova, Czech Republic, EPP/CD

Svoboda, Czech Republic, SOC

Kalus, Czech Republic, EDG

Schwimmer, Austria, EPP/CD

Kuzmickas, Lithuania, EDG

Zingeris, Lithuania, EDG

Gylys, Lithuania, SOC

Raskinis, Lithuania, EPP/CD

Ciupaila, Lithuania, LDR

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

France, National Assembly, Law

May 28, 1998

Adopted Text no. 140

"Small law"

National Assembly

October 4, 1958 Constitution

Eleventh Legislature

Ordinary Session of 1997-1998

May 29, 1998

Law Proposal

Adopted in first reading by the National Assembly relating to recognition of the Armenian genocide of 1915.

The National Assembly adopted the law proposal, the content of which follows:

See numbers: 895 and 925.

Human rights and civil liberties.

Single Article

France publicly recognizes the Armenian genocide of 1915. Publicly deliberated, in Paris, on May 29, 1998.

The President,

Signed: Laurent Fabius.

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Sweden, Parliament, Report

March 29, 2000

The Foreign Ministry writes in its report:

"An official statement and recognition of the Genocide of the Armenians is important and necessary. In 1985 the UN and the European Parliament established the fact that the Ottoman Empire had committed genocide against the Armenian people in the beginning of the 20th century. The Standing Committee [on Foreign Affairs] is of the opinion that the greater openness Turkey demonstrates, the stronger Turkey's democratic identity will be. It is therefore important that unbiased independent and international research on the genocide committed against the Armenian people be carried out. It is of great importance that an increasing openness and historical understanding of the events of 1915 and thereafter be developed. An improvement in this respect would also be of importance for the stability and the development in the whole Caucasus region."

(Unofficial translation)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Utrikesutskottet skriver i sitt bet?nkande att:

"Det ?r angel?get och n?dv?ndigt med en officiell redovisning och erk?nnande av folkmordet p? armenierna. 1985 fastslogs i FN och i Europaparlamentet att det ottomanska riket beg?tt folkmord p? det armeniska folket i b?rjan av detta sekel. Utskottet anser att ju st?rre ?ppenhet Turkiet visar betr?ffande sitt f?rflutna desto mer bidrar det till att st?rka Turkiets demokratiska identitet. Det ?r d?rf?r viktigt att det genomf?rs f?ruts?ttningsl?s oberoende internationell forskning om det folkmord som drabbat den armeniska befolkningen. Det vore av stor vikt om det kan utvecklas en ?kad ?ppenhet och historisk f?rst?else f?r h?ndelserna 1915 och d?refter. En f?rb?ttring h?rvidlag torde ?ven f? betydelse f?r stabiliteten och utvecklingen i Kaukasusregionen i sin helhet."

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Lebanon, Parliament, Resolution

May 11, 2000

On the occasion of the 85th anniversary of massacres perpetrated by the Ottoman authorities in the year 1915, as a result of which 1.5 million Armenians fell victim, the Lebanese Chamber of Deputies recognizes and condemns the genocide perpetrated against the Armenian people and expresses its complete solidarity with demands of its Armenian citizens. Furthermore, it believes that the international recognition of this genocide is a necessary condition for the prevention of similar crimes that may occur in the future.

[unofficial Translation]

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

France, Senate, Law

English Translation]

N°22 SENATE REGULAR SESSION OF 2000-2001

PROPOSED LAW

Adopted by the Senate concerning the recognition of the Armenian Genocide of 1915.

Single article

France publicly recognizes the Armenian Genocide of 1915.

Deliberated in public session in Paris on November 7, 2000.

The President,

Signed: Christian PONCELET.N° 22 S?NAT SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2000-2001

PROPOSITION DE LOIAdopt?e par le S?nat

relative ? la reconnaissance du g?nocide arm?nien de 1915.

Article unique

La France reconna?t publiquement le g?nocide arm?nien de 1915.

D?lib?r?, en s?ance publque, ? Paris, le 7 novembre 2000.

Le Pr?sident,

Sign?: Christian PONCELET.

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Vatican City, Communiqu?

November 10, 2000

"...The Armenian genocide, which began the century, was a prologue to horrors that would follow. Two world wars, countless regional conflicts and deliberately organized campaigns of extermination took the lives of millions of faithful..."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joint Communiqu? of Pope John Paul II and Catholicos Karekin II

His Holiness Pope John Paul II, Bishop of Rome, and His Holiness Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians, give thanks to the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, for enabling them to meet together on the occasion of the Jubilee of the Year 2000 and on the threshold of the 1700th anniversary of the proclamation of Christianity as the state religion of Armenia.

They also give thanks in the Holy Spirit that the fraternal relations between the See of Rome and the See of Etchmiadzin have further developed and deepened in recent years. This progress finds its expression in their present personal meeting and particularly in the gift of a relic of Saint Gregory the Illuminator, the holy missionary who converted the king of Armenia (301 A.D.) and established the line of Catholicoi of the Armenian Church. The present meeting builds upon the previous encounters between Pope Paul VI and Catholicos Vasken I (1970) and upon the two meetings between Pope John Paul II and Catholicos Karekin I (1996 and 1999). Pope John Paul II and Catholicos Karekin II now continue to look forward to a possible meeting in Armenia. On the present occasion, they wish to state together the following.

Together we confess our faith in the Triune God and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, who became man for our salvation. We also believe in One, Catholic, Apostolic and Holy Church. The Church, as the Body of Christ, indeed, is one and unique. This is our common faith, based on the teachings of the Apostles and the Fathers of the Church. We acknowledge furthermore that both the Catholic Church and the Armenian Church have true sacraments, above all – by apostolic succession of bishops – the priesthood and the Eucharist. We continue to pray for full and visible communion between us. The liturgical celebration we preside over together, the sign of peace we exchange and the blessing we give together in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, testify that we are brothers in the episcopacy. Together we are jointly responsible for what is our common mission: to teach the apostolic faith and to witness to the love of Christ for all human beings, especially those living in difficult circumstances.

The Catholic Church and the Armenian Church share a long history of mutual respect, considering their various theological, liturgical and canonical traditions as complementary, rather than conflicting. Today, too, we have much to receive from one another. For the Armenian Church, the vast resources of Catholic learning can become a treasure and source of inspiration, through the exchange of scholars and students, through common translations and academic initiatives, through different forms of theological dialogue. Likewise, for the Catholic Church, the steadfast, patient faith of a martyred nation like Armenia can become a source of spiritual strength, particularly through common prayer. It is our firm desire to see these many forms of mutual exchange and rapprochement between us improved and intensified.

As we embark upon the third millennium, we look back on the past and forward to the future. As to the past, we thank God for the many blessings we have received from his infinite bounty, for the holy witness given by so many saints and martyrs, for the spiritual and cultural heritage bequeathed by our ancestors. Many times, however, both the Catholic Church and the Armenian Church have lived through dark and difficult periods. Christian faith was contested by atheistic and materialistic ideologies; Christian witness was opposed by totalitarian and violent regimes; Christian love was suffocated by individualism and the pursuit of personal interest. Leaders of nations no longer feared God, nor did they feel ashamed before humankind. For both of us, the 20th century was marked by extreme violence. The Armenian genocide, which began the century, was a prologue to horrors that would follow. Two world wars, countless regional conflicts and deliberately organized campaigns of extermination took the lives of millions of faithful. Nevertheless, without diminishing the horror of these events and their consequences, there may be a kind of divine challenge in them, if in response Christians are persuaded to join together in deeper friendship in the cause of Christian truth and love.

We now look to the future with hope and confidence. At this juncture in history, we see new horizons for us Christians and for the world. Both in the East and in the West, after having experienced the deadly consequences of godless regimes and lifestyles, many people are yearning for the knowledge of truth and the way of salvation. Together, guided by charity and respect for freedom, we seek to answer their desire, so as to bring them to the sources of authentic life and true happiness. We seek the intercession of the Apostles Peter and Paul, Thaddeus and Bartholomew, of Saint Gregory the Illuminator and all Saintly Pastors of the Catholic Church and the Armenian Church, and pray the Lord to guide our communities so that, with one voice, we may give witness to the Lord and proclaim the truth of salvation. We also pray that around the world, wherever members of the Armenian and the Catholic Church live side by side, all ordained ministers, religious and faithful will "help to carry one another’s burdens, and in this way obey the law of Christ" (Gal 6: 2). May they mutually sustain and assist one another, in full respect of their particular identities and ecclesiastical traditions, avoiding to prevail one over another: "so then, as often as we have the chance, we should do good to everyone, and especially to those who belong to our family in the faith" (Gal 6:10).

Finally, we seek the intercession of the Holy Mother of God for the sake of peace. May the Lord grant wisdom to the leaders of nations, so that justice and peace may prevail throughout the world. In these days in particular, we pray for peace in the Middle East. May all the children of Abraham grow in mutual respect and find appropriate ways for living peacefully together in this sacred part of the world.

[Original text: English]

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

European Parliament, Resolution

November 15, 2000

"...Calls, therefore, on the Turkish Government and the Turkish Grand National Assembly to give fresh support to the Armenian minority, as an important part of Turkish society, in particular by public recognition of the genocide which that minority suffered before the establishment of the modern state of Turkey;..."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Turkey's progress towards accession

European Parliament resolution on the 1999 Regular Report from the Commission on Turkey's progress towards accession

The European Parliament,

- having regard to Turkey's application for accession to the European Union,

- having regard to its resolution of 3 December 1998 on the European Strategy for Turkey(1),

- having regard to the 1999 Regular Report from the Commission on Turkey's progress towards accession,

- having regard to its resolution of 2 December 1999 on the implementation of measures to intensify the EC-Turkey customs union(2),

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 764/2000 of 10 April 2000 regarding the implementation of measures to intensify the EC-Turkey Customs Union(3),

- having regard to its resolution of 6 September 2000 on measures to promote economic and social development in Turkey(4),

- having regard to its resolution of 7 September 2000 on the Turkish bombardment of northern Iraq(5),

- having regard to Rule 47(1) of the Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy,

A. recalling the decision taken on 13 December 1999 by the European Council meeting in Helsinki to grant Turkey the status of candidate country for accession to the European Union and to establish an accession partnership and a single financial framework with a view to helping Turkey's application to progress in accordance with the Copenhagen Criteria,

B. whereas, following the granting to Turkey of candidate country status, the Union must now, by common agreement with the Turkish Government, devise and implement in an appropriate manner a credible comprehensive strategy with a view to accession,

C. whereas accession negotiations cannot begin until Turkey complies with the Copenhagen criteria,

D. whereas a climate of mutual trust should be created between Turkey and the European Union so that Turkey does not perceive the Union as an 'exclusive Christian club' but as a community of shared values which embrace, in particular, tolerance for other religions and cultures, and whereas no formal cultural or religious conditions are attached to accession to the European Union,

E. whereas a clear and detailed programme will be an effective encouragement to accelerate reform in favour of protection of human rights and democracy, and will greatly strengthen the hand of those in the Turkish government, parliament, and civil society institutions who are keen to establish full respect for basic rights in their country,

F. noting the legislative changes carried out along the path towards democratisation since the 1995 constitutional reform and the establishment in the Turkish Grand National Assembly of the Conciliation Committee, which is responsible for reforming the constitution,

G. welcoming the signature by Turkey on 15 August and 8 September 2000 of four important UN conventions, on political, civil, social and cultural rights respectively, which must be ratified as soon as possible so that human rights and democratic pluralism may be guaranteed in that country,

H. emphasising that, despite the progress already achieved along the path towards democratisation, human rights and the situation of minorities must continue to be improved by the implementation of those conventions,

I. whereas, according to Lord Russell-Johnston, President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the confirmation by Ankara of the sentence imposed on former Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan is not in conformity with the principles of democratic pluralism,

J. whereas Resolution 1250 of the UN Security Council called on the Turkish and Greek Cypriot communities to begin negotiations in the autumn of 1999, and whereas no progress in that direction has been recorded, despite the encouraging contacts made under the aegis of the UN Secretary-General in December 1999 and in January 2000; regretting, on the contrary, the violation of the military status quo by Turkish occupation forces in the village of Strovilia since 1 July 2000,

K. whereas the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in 'Lo?zidou v Turkey' (No 15318/89), handed down on 28 July 1998 and ruling in favour of the plaintiff, has still not been implemented,

L. whereas the election to the Presidency of the Republic of Mr Sezer, who has demonstrated his commitment to the rule of law, will make it easier for the necessary reforms to be successfully completed,

M. noting Turkey's place in the economy of Europe - it had a GDP of USD 185 billion in 1999 - and the links already established between Turkey and the European Union, with 53% of Turkish exports going to current Member States of the European Union and Turkey being the sixth largest importer of EU products,

N. whereas, in December 1999, the package of economic reforms demanded by the IMF with a view to introducing budgetary austerity and to curbing galloping inflation was approved by the Turkish Parliament,

O. encouraging the Turkish Government, on the one hand, to commit itself to carrying out structural reforms which, ranging from dismantling state subsidies to reorganising pensions and accelerating privatisation, must therefore strengthen the bases of a free market economy accessible to all and, on the other, to continue its efforts to adopt Community legislation,

P. recognising Turkey's important geostrategic position, having regard to its role within the Atlantic Alliance and its status of WEU associate member, but noting that geopolitical and strategic considerations must not be the decisive factors in negotiations about accession,

Q. welcoming the fact that Turkey has signalled its intention to commit military capabilities under the common European security and defence policy,

R. regretting and unequivocally condemning the recent incursion by the Turkish Air Force into Iraqi airspace when Kendakor was bombed on 15 August 2000,

S. endorsing the view set out in the Commission report that Turkey has undertaken a significant process of self-evaluation as regards the level of harmonisation of its legislation with the acquis communautaire and that it is the only candidate country to have joined the Customs Union,

T. welcoming the decision taken in this spirit on 5 July 2000 by the Turkish Parliament to include in the eighth five-year development plan the principles governing transposition of the acquis communautaire and to establish a Secretariat for the European Union responsible for coordinating the work required for such transposition,

U. emphasising, however, that a sustained effort is still needed to push through the current reform of the Turkish Civil Code, with particular regard to parental and women's rights,

V. expressing its concern about the bill seeking to make it possible to dismiss civil servants on ideological or religious grounds,

1. Welcomes the resumption of institutional activities and political dialogue in the Association Council, which met on 11 April 2000 after being suspended for three years, and welcomes in particular the recent implementation of the Association Council's conclusions with the initiation of an analytical review of the acquis communautaire through the establishment of eight subcommittees entrusted with the task of setting priorities for incorporation of the acquis; notes with satisfaction that the first meetings of three of those subcommittees have been successful and trusts that the remaining subcommittees" meetings will be held by the end of this year;

2. Encourages the Turkish Government to step up its efforts to achieve democratisation, with particular regard to reform of the Penal Code, independence of the judiciary, freedom of expression, the rights of minorities and the separation of powers, and especially the impact of the role of the army on Turkish political life;

3. Calls on the Turkish Government and Parliament to ratify and implement the UN conventions on political, civil, social and cultural rights which it signed recently;

4. Encourages in this respect the Turkish Parliament and Government to incorporate in the government programme the report drawn up by the Secretariat of the Turkish Supreme Coordination Council for Human Rights; welcomes the Turkish Council of Ministers" adoption of this report on 21 September 2000 as a "reference and working document"; and calls for the section on cultural rights to be reinserted into the report, with specific measures to protect the rights of minorities being added thereto;

5. Looks forward to the early abolition of the State Security Courts and welcomes the adoption of the law suspending the prosecution of, and penalties imposed on, press and broadcasting offences;

6. Calls, initially, for an amnesty with a view to achieving a reform of the Penal Code in the medium term so that it complies with the universal principle of freedom of expression;

7. Views the recent decision by the Constitutional Court on the law offering a reprieve to those who have committed press offences as a step that reinforces the rule of law; encourages the competent authorities to take this opportunity to continue their reforms in this direction, knowing that this process will logically lead them to a fundamental reconsideration of Article 312 of the Penal Code;

8. Calls, after the many promises made to this effect, for the death penalty to be abolished as soon as possible as part of the reform of the Penal Code and, pending such abolition, for the current moratorium on executions to be maintained;

9. Recalls the importance it attaches to recognition of the basic rights of the cultural, linguistic and religious groups in Turkey, who make up the country's multifaceted population;

10. Calls, therefore, on the Turkish Government and the Turkish Grand National Assembly to give fresh support to the Armenian minority, as an important part of Turkish society, in particular by public recognition of the genocide which that minority suffered before the establishment of the modern state of Turkey;

11. Notes the decisions taken on 30 November 1999 to lift the state of emergency in the Province of Siirt and on 26 June 2000 in the Province of Van, and calls on the Turkish Government to lift the state of emergency in the other provinces of the south-eastern region as well; calls for a specific solution to be found for the Kurdish people, encompassing the requisite political, economic and social responses;

12. Urges the Turkish Government genuinely to redirect its policy with a view to improving the human rights situation of all its citizens, including those belonging to groups whose roots go back deep into the country's past, by putting an end to the political, social and cultural discrimination which they suffer, and in order to find, for those of Kurdish origin, a political solution which respects the territorial integrity of Turkey; calls also on the Turkish authorities to engage in a dialogue with the political representatives of the Kurdish community, especially the mayors of towns in the south-east of the country;

13. Demands the release of Leyla Zana, winner of the European Parliament Sakharov Prize, and of the former MPs of Kurdish origin imprisoned because of the views they hold;

14. Welcomes the Turkish Government's adoption in September 2000 of an action plan which aims to restore economic balance with a view to resolving regional disparities by committing appropriate resources, and to promote the reopening of hamlets and the reconstruction of villages so that their inhabitants may return to them, together with other measures aimed at boosting investment in the south-east;

15. Welcomes the decisions taken by the Helsinki European Council to set up a single financial framework, based on an appropriate level of resources, and an accession partnership; calls on the Council and Commission to implement those two decisions as soon as possible and to reassess the amount of the European Union's financial assistance to Turkey, which should meet the needs of the pre-accession strategy on the basis of previous European Council conclusions with particular reference to the issue of human rights as well as the issues referred to in paragraphs 4 and 9(a) of the Helsinki conclusions;

16. Calls on the European Council, in accordance with the provisions of the European Union's political dialogue with the associated countries, to take note of the Turkish Government's request to be involved in one way or another in the process of developing the common foreign and security policy and welcomes Turkey's determination to contribute to improving European capabilities within the framework of the common European security and defence policy; considers that any such contribution has to be preceded by a clearly stated policy of respect for the territorial integrity of Member States;

17. Welcomes the start of negotiations on confidence-building measures agreed on 31 October 2000 by the foreign ministers of both Turkey and Greece;

18. Calls on the Turkish Government, in accordance with Resolution 1250 of the UN Security Council, to contribute towards the creation, without preconditions, of a climate conducive to negotiations between the Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities, with a view to reaching a negotiated, comprehensive, just and lasting settlement which complies with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and the recommendations of the UN General Assembly, as reaffirmed by the European Council; hopes that this will be possible during the fifth round of proximity talks which will begin on 10 November 2000 and that those talks will result in bilateral negotiations, under the aegis of the UN, which will enable substantial progress to be made;

19. Calls on the Turkish Government to withdraw its occupation forces from northern Cyprus;

20. Calls on the Turkish Government, as it has proposed, to improve its relations with all its neighbours in the Caucasus within the framework of a Stability Pact for the region;

21. Calls in this connection on the Turkish Government to launch a dialogue with Armenia aimed in particular at re-establishing normal diplomatic and trade relations between the two countries and lifting the current blockade;

22. Calls on the Turkish Government, in cooperation with the Commission, to pursue its efforts with a view to enhancing the implementation of the pre-accession strategy as regards the incorporation of the acquis communautaire, notably by improving the situation in fields such as the single market, agriculture, transport, the environment and administrative organisation;

23. Welcomes the Turkish Government's recent statement that the reform process, which covers the amendments to the Turkish Penal and Civil Codes, including parental and women's rights, would be stepped up during the coming year;

24. Calls on the Turkish Government to comply with previous and future decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and to consider the proposals made by the Council of Europe with regard to the training of judges and police officers;

25. Reminds Turkey also of the commitments it has given within the Council of Europe and calls on it to transpose Council of Europe instruments in particular so as to permit more effective monitoring of the application of political measures that are part of the accession partnership;

26. Takes the view that Turkey does not currently meet all the Copenhagen political criteria and reiterates its proposal for the setting up of discussion forums, consisting of eminent politicians from the European Union and Turkey as well as representatives of civil society, in order to promote political dialogue and help Turkey progress along the path towards accession; welcomes the initiative taken by the former President of Turkey, Mr Demirel, to establish a Europe-Turkey Foundation, which might also be involved in those forums;

27. Calls on the Commission to devise and implement additional programmes in the field of education, given the exceptionally high proportion of the population (50%) under 25, in order to help foster understanding of the basic principles of the shared values of Europe;

28. Calls on the Council and the Commission to find ways to improve the effectiveness of MEDA Programmes for democracy in Turkey with a view to strengthening civil society there, consolidating the democratic system and supporting free and independent media in that country;

29. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the Turkish Government and Grand National Assembly.

(1) OJ C 398, 21.12.1998, p. 57.

(2) OJ C 194, 11.7.2000, p. 65.

(3) OJ L 94, 14.4.2000, p. 6.

(4) Texts Adopted, Item 3.

(5) Texts Adopted, Item 18.

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Italy, Chamber of Deputies, Resolution

November 16, 2000

Resolution

The Italian Chamber of Deputies has observed that on November 15, 2000, the European Parliament approved by a large majority a proposal deriving from the Periodic Review on the progress made by Turkey towards admission to the European Union, a review completed by the European Commission in 1999. The Turkish government has been encouraged to intensify its efforts towards democratization, especially in the fields of criminal law reform, independence of the judiciary, freedom of expression, and the rights of minorities.

The Italian Chamber of Deputies has also observed that the recent resolution deals with questions concerning the Armenian people in three paragraphs of particular significance: "we urge recognition of the genocide inflicted upon the Armenian minority [within the Ottoman Empire] committed before the creation of the modern Republic of Turkey (paragraph 10); improvements of relations with Turkey's neighbors in the Caucuses, as proposed by the Turkish government itself (paragraph 20);" and, in support of the suggestions put forward in paragraph 21 by the Hon. D. Cohn-Bendit, President of the Bipartisan Parliamentary Commission on EU-Turkish Relations, "invites the Turkish government to open negotiations with the Republic of Armenia, restore diplomatic relations and trade between the two countries, placing an end to the blockade currently in place.

The Chamber of Deputies therefore urges the Italian Government, in concordance with the proposals described above, to pursue energetically the easing of all tensions between peoples and minorities in that area [i.e. the Caucasus], in order to create, with due observance of the territorial integrity of the two states, pacific coexistence and respect for human rights, thereby expediting a more rapid integration of Turkey within the European Community.

(Unofficial translation)

RISOLUZIONI

Allegato A

Seduta n. 813 del 17/11/2000

TESTO AGGIORNATO AL 27 NOVEMBRE 2000

La Camera,

premesso che:

il 15 novembre il Parlamento europeo, discutendo la relazione periodica della Commissione sui progressi realizzati dalla Turchia verso l'adesione all'Unione europea, ha approvato tale relazione che contiene tra l'altro i seguenti principi che riguardano il popolo armeno: Articolo 10 «Invita pertanto il governo turco e la Grande Assemblea Nazionale turca a sostenere maggiormente la minoranza armena in quanto parte importante della societ? turca, riconoscendo pubblicamente, in particolare, il genocidio commesso ai danni di tale minoranza anteriormente allo stabilimento della moderna Repubblica di Turchia»; Articolo 21 «Invita a questo proposito il governo turco ad avviare un dialogo con l'Armenia, segnatamente al fine di ristabilire relazioni diplomatiche e commerciali normali tra i due paesi e di togliere il blocco attualmente in vigore»;

impegna il Governo

anche sulla base di quanto sopra esposto ad adoperarsi per il definitivo superamento di ogni contrapposizione nella regione al fine di creare le premesse per la corretta tutela dei diritti umani nella prospettiva del progressivo avvicinamento ed integrazione della regione con l'Unione europea.

«Pagliarini, Pisanu, Selva, Follini, Rivolta, Morselli, Calzavara, Trantino, Mitolo, Masi, Lo Jucco, Di Luca, Palmizio».

(16 novembre 2000)

La Camera,

preso atto che:

il 15 novembre il Parlamento europeo ha approvato a larga maggioranza una risoluzione sulla Relazione periodica 1999 della Commissione europea sui progressi della Turchia verso l'adesione che incoraggia il Governo turco a intensificare i suoi sforzi di democratizzazione, soprattutto nel campo della riforma del codice penale, dell'indipendenza della giustizia, della libert? di espressione e dei diritti delle minoranze; la risoluzione in particolare affronta questioni che riguardano il popolo armeno in tre paragrafi assai significativi: «invito al riconoscimento del genocidio ai danni della minoranza armena, commesso anteriormente allo stabilimento della moderna Repubblica turca» (paragrafo 10); «miglioramento delle relazioni con tutti i vicini del Caucaso, come proposto dallo steso Governo turco» (paragrafo 20); sottolineando lo spirito del paragrafo 21, proposto dall'onorevole Cohn-Bendit, presidente della commissione parlamentare mista UE-Turchia, che «invita il Governo turco ad avviare un dialogo con l'Armenia, segnatamente al fine di ristabilire relazioni diplomatiche e commerciali normali tra i due paesi e di togliere il blocco attualmente in vigore»,

impegna il Governo

in coerenza con i principi sopra esposti ad adoperarsi per il completo superamento di ogni contrapposizione tra popoli e minoranze diverse nell'area al fine di creare le condizioni, nel rispetto dell'integrit? territoriale dei due Stati, per la pacifica convivenza e la corretta tutela dei diritti umani nella prospettiva di una pi? rapida integrazione della Turchia e dell'intera regione nell'Unione europea.

«Mussi, Paissan, Soro, Monaco, Grimaldi, Manzione, Crema, Bastianoni, Mazzocchin».

(16 novembre 2000)

La Camera,

preso atto che:

il 15 novembre il Parlamento europeo ha approvato a larga maggioranza una risoluzione sulla Relazione periodica 1999 della Commissione europea sui progressi della Turchia verso l'adesione che incoraggia il Governo turco a intensificare i suoi sforzi di democratizzazione, soprattutto nel campo della riforma del codice penale, dell'indipendenza della giustizia, della libert? di espressione e dei diritti delle minoranze; la risoluzione in particolare affronta questioni che riguardano il popolo armeno in tre paragrafi assai significativi: «invito al riconoscimento del genocidio ai danni della minoranza armena, commesso anteriormente allo stabilimento della moderna Repubblica turca» (paragrafo 10); «miglioramento delle relazioni con tutti i vicini del Caucaso, come proposto dallo stesso Governo turco» (paragrafo 20); sottolineando lo spirito del paragrafo 21, proposto dall'onorevole Cohn-Bendit, presidente della commissione parlamentare mista UE-Turchia, che «invita il Governo turco ad avviare un dialogo con l'Armenia, segnatamente al fine di ristabilire relazioni diplomatiche e commerciali normali tra i due paesi e di togliere il blocco attualmente in vigore»,

impegna il Governo

in coerenza con i principi sopra esposti ad adoperarsi per il completo superamento di ogni contrapposizione tra popoli e minoranze diverse nell'area al fine di creare le condizioni, nel rispetto dell'integrit? territoriale dei due Stati, per la pacifica convivenza e la corretta tutela dei diritti umani nella prospettiva di una pi? rapida integrazione della Turchia e dell'intera regione nell'Unione europea.

«Mussi, Pagliarini, Paissan, Pisanu, Soro, Selva, Monaco, Follini, Grimaldi, Rivolta, Manzione, Morselli, Crema, Calzavara, Bastianoni, Trantino, Mazzocchin, Mitolo, Pezzoni, Masi, Lo Jucco, Brunetti, Giovanni Bianchi, Leccese, Rizzi, Ballaman, Lento, Bosco, Palmizio».

(16 novembre 2000)

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

France, Law

January 29, 2001

Law no. 2001-70 of January 29, 2001, relating to the recognition of the Armenian Genocide of 1915:

The National Assembly and the Senate have adopted and the President of the Republic proclaims the following law:

France publicly recognizes the Armenian Genocide of 1915.

The present law shall be executed as a law of the state.

Done at Paris on January 29, 2001.

Jacque Chirac

For the President of the Republic:

Prime Minister Lionel Jospin

(1) Preparatory documents: Law no. 2001-70.

Senate: Proposed law no. 60, discussed and adopted on November 7, 2000.

National Assembly: Proposed law adopted by the Senate, No. 2688.

Report by Fran?ois Rochebloine for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, no. 2855, discussed and adopted on January 18, 2001.

(Unofficial translation)

LOI no 2001-70 du 29 janvier 2001 relative ? la reconnaissance du g?nocide arm?nien de 1915 (1)

L'Assembl?e nationale et le S?nat ont adopt?,

Le Pr?sident de la R?publique promulgue la loi dont la teneur suit:

Article unique

La France reconna?t publiquement le g?nocide arm?nien de 1915.

La pr?sente loi sera ex?cut?e comme loi de l'Etat.

Fait ? Paris, le 29 janvier 2001.

Jacques Chirac

Par le Pr?sident de la R?publique:

Le Premier ministre,

Lionel Jospin

(1) Travaux pr?paratoires: loi no 2001-70.

S?nat: Proposition de loi no 60 (2000-2001); Discussion et adoption le 7 novembre 2000.

Assembl?e nationale: Proposition de loi, adopt?e par le S?nat, no 2688;

Rapport de M. Fran?ois Rochebloine, au nom de la commission des affaires ?trang?res, no 2855; Discussion et adoption le 18 janvier 2001.

Ссылка на комментарий
Поделиться на других сайтах

Создайте аккаунт или войдите в него для комментирования

Вы должны быть пользователем, чтобы оставить комментарий

Создать аккаунт

Зарегистрируйтесь для получения аккаунта. Это просто!

Зарегистрировать аккаунт

Войти

Уже зарегистрированы? Войдите здесь.

Войти сейчас

  • Наш выбор

    • Ани - город 1001 церкви
      Самая красивая, самая роскошная, самая богатая… Такими словами можно характеризовать жемчужину Востока - город АНИ, который долгие годы приковывал к себе внимание, благодаря исключительной красоте и величию. Даже сейчас, когда от города остались только руины, он продолжает вызывать восхищение.
      Город Ани расположен на высоком берегу одного из притоков реки Ахурян.
       

       
       
      • 4 ответа
    • В БЕРЛИНЕ БОЛЬШЕ НЕТ АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА
      Конец азербайджанской истории в Университете им. Гумбольдта: Совет студентов резко раскритиковал кафедру, финансируемую режимом. Кафедра, финансируемая со стороны, будет ликвидирована.
      • 1 ответ
    • Фильм: "Арцах непокорённый. Дадиванк"  Автор фильма, Виктор Коноплёв
      Фильм: "Арцах непокорённый. Дадиванк"
      Автор фильма Виктор Коноплёв.
        • Like
      • 0 ответов
    • В Риме изберут Патриарха Армянской Католической церкви
      В сентябре в Риме пройдет епископальное собрание, в рамках которого планируется избрание Патриарха Армянской Католической церкви.
       
      Об этом сообщает VaticanNews.
       
      Ранее, 22 июня, попытка избрать патриарха провалилась, поскольку ни один из кандидатов не смог набрать две трети голосов, а это одно из требований, избирательного синодального устава восточных церквей.

       
      Отмечается, что новый патриарх заменит Григора Петроса, который скончался в мае 2021 года. С этой целью в Рим приглашены епископы Армянской Католической церкви, служащие в епархиях различных городов мира.
       
      Епископы соберутся в Лионской духовной семинарии в Риме. Выборы начнутся под руководством кардинала Леонардо Сантри 22 сентября.
       
      • 0 ответов
    • History of Modern Iran
      Решил познакомить вас, с интересными материалами специалиста по истории Ирана.
      Уверен, найдете очень много интересного.
       
      Edward Abrahamian, "History of Modern Iran". 
      "В XIX веке европейцы часто описывали Каджарских шахов как типичных "восточных деспотов". Однако на самом деле их деспотизм существовал лишь в виртуальной реальности. 
      Власть шаха была крайне ограниченной из-за отсутствия государственной бюрократии и регулярной армии. Его реальная власть не простиралась далее столицы. Более того, его авторитет практически ничего не значил на местном уровне, пока не получал поддержку региональных вельмож
      • 4 ответа
  • Сейчас в сети   3 пользователя, 0 анонимных, 128 гостей (Полный список)

  • День рождения сегодня

  • Сейчас в сети

    128 гостей
    Good Boy stephanie S melkum
  • Сейчас на странице

    Нет пользователей, просматривающих эту страницу.

  • Сейчас на странице

    • Нет пользователей, просматривающих эту страницу.


×
×
  • Создать...